Skip to content

Measuring Teaching Effectiveness

Measuring Teaching Effectiveness

Faculty play a vital role in fulfilling Clemson’s primary purpose of “educating undergraduate and graduate students to think deeply about and engage in the social, scientific, economic, and professional challenges of our times.” As such, teaching effectiveness has become a key component of faculty evaluations, merit pay decisions, tenure, promotion, and reappointment.

The College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences has compiled discipline-specific resources and examples to make it easier for faculty to identify and provide appropriate evidence of teaching effectiveness. In consultation with their department chair and TPR committee, faculty should select the types of evidence that most appropriately demonstrate their successes

The diagram demonstrates a succinct, yet holistic, approach to articulating your teaching effectiveness. It provides a framework for you, as a faculty member, to (a) introduce and contextualize your teaching through your teaching philosophy, (b) provide three pieces of persuasive evidence of teaching excellence, and (c) provide an interpretation of your students’ course evaluation feedback.

The faculty manual requires faculty to include student feedback from the end-of-course evaluations. Faculty are encouraged to provide context and an interpretation of this feedback along with a description of how they used feedback to improve their teaching effectiveness. In short, the diagram provides a way to craft a coherent narrative about your teaching.

diagram of contents in the tenure and promotion packet content content

Descriptions of Acceptable Measurements

Teaching Effectiveness Measures from Clemson's Faculty Manual

  • Evidence-based measurements of student learning

    Evidence-based measurements of student learning (such as pre- and post-testing or student work samples) that meet defined student learning outcomes

    Application
    Useful for displaying impact on student learning—how the faculty member’s teaching contributed to increased knowledge/skills.

    Considerations
    Faculty should carefully select courses (levels and sections) that accurately reflect the faculty member’s strengths and expertise and should anticipate administering these measurements across multiple semesters. This type requires advance planning to design assignments and/or ensure effective administration of pre- and post-tests.

    Timeline
    At least two full semesters, plus time for planning and evaluation of results.

    Parties
    Faculty member; Director of Assessment; OTEI, as needed.

    Example
    In one of her 4000-level courses, Susan designed a final group project to measure students’ attainment of the course’s student learning outcomes. Susan collects the final projects across multiple semesters and presents
    (a) original directions for the assignment,
    (b) a sample of the completed projects,
    (c) the corresponding student learning outcomes from the course,
    (d) the rubric used for grading, and
    (e) an explanation of any observed trends.

    Related Resources

    • Learning-Focused Assignment Guide. This holistic guide can help you assess the alignment, transparency, and inclusivity of your assignments, in terms of development, use, and revision of assignments.
    • Learning-Focused Assignment Rubric. This rubric preceded the creation of the assignment guide and uses a point-scoring system. From the Universities of Virginia and George Mason.
    • Learning-Focused Test Guide. This guide helps you assess the alignment, transparency, and inclusivity of your tests, both development and deployment.
    • Test Blueprint Guide. This guide walks you through the process of creating a simple blueprint to evaluate your test questions and check on alignment with learning outcomes.
  • Peer/Administration Evaluation of course materials, learning objectives, and examinations

    Evaluation (by peers and/or administrators) of course materials, learning objectives, and examinations

    Application
    Provides information about the quality of materials designed by the faculty member for the purpose of effectively teaching course content.

    Considerations
    Faculty should carefully select courses (levels and sections) that accurately reflect the faculty member’s strengths and expertise. Faculty should utilize resources and protocols provided by OTEI to ensure consistency across evaluations.

    Timeline
    At least one full semester, depending on number of evaluators and volume of materials to evaluate.

    Parties
    Faculty member; Peer evaluator(s); Administrator(s); TPR Committee; Senior faculty with teaching appointments; OTEI, as needed

    Example
    Susan gathers the teaching materials, learning objectives, and exams from a 4000-level course she consistently teaches. She asks her department chair to use the protocols and rubrics from OTEI to evaluate her materials and provide feedback, including suggestions for improvement.

    Related Resources

    • Learning-Focused Assignment Guide. This holistic guide can help you assess the alignment, transparency, and inclusivity of your assignments, in terms of development, use, and revision of assignments.
    • Learning-Focused Assignment Rubric. This rubric preceded the creation of the assignment guide and uses a point-scoring system. From the Universities of Virginia and George Mason.
    • Learning-Focused Test Guide. This guide helps you assess the alignment, transparency, and inclusivity of your tests, both development and deployment.
    • Test Blueprint Guide. This guide walks you through the process of creating a simple blueprint to evaluate your test questions and check on alignment with learning outcomes.
    • Diversity & Inclusion Syllabus Statements. This resource lists a series of examples of statements from various institutions, compiled by the Clemson Faculty Learning Community “Dive In”.
    • Faculty may also self-evaluate teaching practices and course materials with regards to diversity and inclusion, using the resources on the OTEI Diversity, Equity and Inclusion page.
    • A Guide to Assessing the Focus of Syllabi. This article provides an overview and instructions for using a “valid and reliable syllabus rubric” from the University of Virginia. Faculty can also visit the OTEI website for a current version of the CU Syllabus Template (“the Student-Centered Undergraduate Syllabus Template” and others) at the Clemson Teaching page.
  • In-class visitation by peers and/or administrators

    In-class visitation by peers and/or administrators

    Application
    Offers structured feedback from a trained peer observer (ideally) as evidence of effective pedagogical tactics and in-class interactions.

    Considerations
    This type is most impactful when multiple in-class visitations are completed. Using a trained peer observer will ensure important pedagogical components are evaluated.

    Timeline
    Up to one full semester to identify peer observer, schedule visit, and receive feedback.

    Parties
    Faculty member; Peer evaluator(s); Administrator(s); OTEI, as needed

    Example
    Susan schedules a peer faculty member and her department chair for in-class observations of her 4000-level capstone course. Both use protocols provided by OTEI to offer feedback on specific components of her teaching performance.

    Related Resources

  • Statement of teaching methods and/or teaching philosophy

    A statement by the faculty member describing the faculty member’s teaching methods and/or teaching philosophy

    Application
    Offers valuable context for other evidence types.

    Considerations
    Teaching philosophies should be recent and often benefit from review by a peer faculty member or administrator. Because it provides context, the faculty member may want to include this in addition to three other evidence types.

    Timeline
    2 weeks, if seeking feedback.

    Parties
    Faculty Member; Peer faculty member(s)

    Example
    Susan ensures her teaching philosophy document is up-to-date and shares the document with her department chair and OTEI for feedback. She makes adjustments based on feedback.

    Related Resources

  • Exit interview/surveys with current graduates/alumni

    Exit interview/surveys with current graduates/alumni

    Application: 
    Uses the voices of alumni and/or students at the end of their degree program to provide first-hand reflective feedback related to the faculty member’s role as an educator.

    Considerations
    Interviews and surveys measure student perceptions in a manner similar to that of course evaluations. Ensure response rates are high enough to accurately reflect overall student sentiment.

    Timeline
    Depending on size of program, 3-4 semesters of feedback may be needed to show consistency. If no current personal, departmental, or program-level system is in place, this will take longer.

    Parties
    Faculty member; Administrator(s); Student Services Coordinator(s)

    Example
    Susan’s department administers exit surveys to all graduate students. Her chair aggregates the responses from Susan’s advisees and provides those responses to Susan in a report.

    Related Resources

  • Follow-up statement of teaching methods/philosophy relating to student feedback/evaluations

    A statement by the faculty member of teaching methods or philosophy that also describes and documents how feedback from student rating of course experiences or evaluation instruments above were used to improve teaching.

    Application
    Displays how the faculty member is willing and able to use feedback in an attempt to improve their teaching performance.

    Considerations
    Builds upon other evidence types (e.g., using evaluation of course materials to make pedagogical changes). May act as valuable response to early/previous negative, teaching-related feedback.

    Timeline
    At least 2 full semesters—one to gather feedback and one to design and execute changes.

    Parties
    Faculty member; Director of Assessment & OTEI, as needed

    Example
    After receiving feedback from classroom observations, Susan uses the feedback to edit her syllabus for clarity, as well as incorporate more classroom discussions and in-class group activities. She tracks final exam scores for several subsequent semesters to document potential improvement in mean scores.

    After receiving quantitative and qualitative feedback from student end of course evaluations, John interpreted the results and looked for practices to continue and practices to improve, documenting actions that he took in response to the feedback.

You may also consider using additional criteria as appropriate for the discipline and degree level of the students. Please refer to the section that follows for details on those criteria.

Additional Measures of Teaching Effectiveness

Note: Evidence of teaching effectiveness for the purpose of faculty evaluations, merit pay, tenure, promotion, or reappointment should always be selected in consultation with your department chair and TPR committee.

  • Development of new courses or curricula

    Useful for showing incorporation of feedback and currency of curricula within the field.

    Considerations
    This type can take significant advanced planning, including working with department leaders and curriculum committees.

    If the course involves a change of delivery mode (i.e., from face-to-face to online), consider working with Clemson Online and the Office of Teaching Effectiveness and Innovation.

    Timeline
    At least one full semester of preparation, plus additional time if course must be approved by curriculum committees

    Parties
    Faculty, curriculum committees, department chair, program coordinator, Clemson Online (if relevant), OTEI

    Example
    John converted the curriculum for two traditional (face-to-face) classes to an online format, working with Clemson Online to update the types of activities, assignments, and learning materials he used for the class.

  • Incorporation of new knowledge and unique teaching techniques into courses, labs, etc.

    Provides evidence of innovation in the classroom/laboratory and/or adaptation to student needs.

    Considerations
    Consider basing your techniques on approaches that have been tested or suggested for use in your field.

    Document the experience so you can reference it again later or use the experience as a potential publication opportunity.

    Timeline
    At least one full semester to execute the new knowledge or techniques, plus additional time for planning

    Parties
    Faculty, peers, OTEI

    Example
    John used an example of a “flipped” classroom that he saw at a recent conference and applied the idea to a single section of his 2000-level course, documenting observations, student scores, and feedback along the way.

  • Publications relative to teaching methodology, effectiveness, or course content (e.g., journal articles, textbooks, lab manuals)

    Offers peer-reviewed evidence that methodologies or course content were intentional, measurable, and/or impactful.

    Considerations
    If designed intentionally, publications can result from the collection of other teaching effectiveness evidence types.

    Timeline
    At least two semesters to design, collect evidence, write up observations, submit for review, and see publication

    Parties
    Faculty, peers, Director of Assessment (if applicable), OTEI

    Example
    John wanted to try a new activity in one of his lab sections to measure its potential impact on student learning. He designed the activity as a human subjects experiment, compared student learning across sections, wrote up his observations, and submitted them for peer review.

    Resources
    OTEI (Click on "Teaching as Research.")

  • Recognition for teaching excellence

    Indicates exceptional teaching effort and outcomes warranting public recognition or awards.

    Considerations
    These can be at any level—departmental, societal, state, federal—as long as they involve teaching.

    Timeline
    Depends on type of award and requirements for consideration

    Parties
    Varies

    Example
    John received the college’s Award for Excellence in Teaching his second year teaching at Clemson.

    Related Resources

  • Invitations to teach in workshops, guest lecture, or visiting professorships

    Useful for showing external recognition of, and value for, quality teaching in the field.

    Considerations
    Even if you were unable to accept, the invitation itself is evidence that your teaching is valued by a variety of individuals.

    Timeline
    Depends on type of event or invitation

    Parties
    Varies

    Example
    John was invited by a peer institution to guest lecture on his area of expertise.

  • Participation in professional development related to improving teaching skills or methods

    Provides information about faculty’s effort to improve their pedagogical skills.

    Considerations
    Clemson offers various teaching-related workshops throughout the year; also consider those designed by your professional organizations.

    Timeline
    Workshops and professional development events vary from a single to day to an entire year of participation

    Parties
    OTEI, Clemson Online, Division of Equity and Inclusion and other Clemson Units; national organizations; other.

    Example
    During the summer, John attended a week-long workshop series offered to higher ed faculty by NAAEE. At the workshop, he learned how to design a new series of activities and implemented the series in his 3000-level course.

  • Service to the teaching profession (e.g., peer reviewing fellow faculty, serving on professional societies)

    Offers information about time and effort spent contributing to overall improvement in the classroom.

    Considerations
    May involve teaching-related service specific to Clemson, your field of expertise, organization, or specific regions.

    This type references your contributions to improve teaching, as a whole. It is an opportunity for you to provide information about peer reviews you have completed or teaching-related leadership roles you have held.

    Timeline
    Depends on type of service

    Parties
    n/a

    Example
    John was nominated as chair of the Teaching Innovation Committee of a professional organization. As chair, he led the effort to award members’ exceptional efforts in teaching and designed a speaker series that ran the duration of his tenure as chair of the committee.

    * For more information see the above section titled "Peer/Administration Evaluation of course materials, learning objectives, and examinations"

  • Effective service to students including advising, direction of student research, developing co-curricular activities, and/or serving on graduate committees

    Provides evidence of positive student-teacher relationships that persist beyond a course and impact the long-term success of students.

    Considerations
    This evidence type involves faculty-student interactions that directly impact the student’s academic experience and progression through the program.

    Timeline
    Several continuous semesters

    Parties
    n/a

    Example
    During his time at Clemson, John has seen half of his undergraduate advisees go on to graduate school and has served as major advisor to 6 M.S. students and 5 Ph. D. students.